Clinton tries again to white wash history

Taken from NRO this morning:

Will ABC Cave on 'The Path to 9/11' [Andy McCarthy]

I'm hearing all kinds of disturbing, though predictable, stories about a Clintonista offensive against 'The Path to 9/11,' an ABC documentary written and produced by Cyrus Nowrasteh ('Into the West', and directed by David Cunningham ('To End All Wars'. I haven't seen it yet (although I hope to this weekend), but it is already drawing rave reviews from people who have (the piece is reviewed at FrontPage, here).

Apparently, the documentary recounts the bureaucratic bungling and lack of action against al Qaeda that was pervasive prior to the September 11 atrocities. It is by no means, I understand, pro-Bush. It is, instead, an effort to present history accurately. This evidently has many former Clinton officials and apologists in their default kill-the-messenger mode. Great pressure is being brought to bear on ABC and Disney to reopen the editorial process at this late stage (the documentary is supposed to air on September 10-11) so that the years 1993-2001 may remain forever airbrushed.

Will they succeed? This bears watching.

Why is it that a film that advocates killing Bush is to be lauded and a accurate film putting the Clinton administration in a less than grand light is to be attacked.

Liberals talk a good game of open mindedness and tollerance of other views but in reality only want their view point propogated. It is the democrats that beleive in restriction of ideas and press.

Any way I hope ABC resists the thought police of the Clinton administration. Clinton did have documented chances to stop Osama and chose to bomb aspirin factories instead.

'Liberals talk a good game of open mindedness and tollerance of other views but in reality only want their view point propogated. It is the democrats that beleive in restriction of ideas and press.'

Exactly. Couldn't have said it better.

I assume nothing I simply point out that serious and well sourced program is being attacked because it makes Blow Job Bill look bad.

I will stipulate that Bush is not in the true conserviative mold.

I will further stipulate that I do not think that So Damm Insane was really involved in 9/11.

I do however believe he had his WMD's shipped to Syria.

How does this change the fact that Clinton had at least 2 chances to nail Osama (Sudan and Afghanistan) and choose not to??

Nobody defines 'kill-the-messenger mode' like the current un-elected administration. They're rampant abuse of it is unprecedented in the history of this nation.