Andres Serranos Watershed or Just Great Art?

Has any artwork pissed off Reichwing nutjobs more than the infamous, the legendary 'Piss Christ?'

Feast your eyes on a masterpiece of subversive art:

'Has any artwork pissed off Reichwing nutjobs more than the infamous, the legendary 'Piss Christ?'

Do you think that it was created for any other reason. When something is done for the sake of shock value, it is no longer art, but a prank

Faggot, fetish art.

It wasn't created for shock value.

It's a great photo, good color and composition.

Is it because it was

Actually a devout Catholic.

That's you projecting your own 'values' - thus you're a fetishy-faggot.

It's a masterpiece of lame art, at best. There's nothing brilliant or challenging about dropping an image of Christ on the cross into a vat of piss and taking a picture of it. It's really not art at all. It's more of a really amateurish political cartoon than anything else. Throwing crap at an image of the virgin mary is in the same catagory. I suppose it's 'subversive' in the sense that blowing up a church would be subversive, but there's no real point to it and nothing to be gained from it. It doesn't challenge or better humanity in any way or make anybody think anything beyond 'Is this really art?' I'll bet this 'arteest' couldn't draw Bugs Bunny on a canvas with a magic marker if his life depended on it.

If he ever starts taking interesting or meaningful or even pretty photographs, I hope he will get back to us. Until then, he is about as useful to liberals as the KKK is to conservatives.