My Profile

Keep Up to Date:
Blog RSS
Blog
Forum RSS
Forum
Search

Buy & Sell

Used (Like New) $20

Post New Topic Post Reply
Posted 6 Months, 3 Weeks ago
pra1968
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 14
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Lied, or is foolish. You pick.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 6 Months, 3 Weeks ago
Shaney65
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 13
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Any yellowcake (slightly processed ore) in Iraq was under watch of the IAEA and was no threat to anyone. Liar.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 6 Months, 3 Weeks ago
Nunikares
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 9
graphgraph
User Offline
 
You missed my point. Why am I not surprised?
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 6 Months, 3 Weeks ago
ScreeTT
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 12
graphgraph
User Offline
 
No, it's because we DO care about the truth. It's you righties who keep apologizing for his lies and trying to explain them away who manifestly do not care about the truth. Whatever it is you DO care about, I have no idea, but it is not the truth.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 6 Months, 3 Weeks ago
mortakrjak
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 11
graphgraph
User Offline
 
If you're going to make a point, you should state it. Still waiting.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 6 Months, 3 Weeks ago
master_mind_81
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 17
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Mike produced a list of Democratic politicians who claimed that Saddam had WMDs and was a threat. But you would have us believe that Bush lied when he said the same thing.

That's the point
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 6 Months, 3 Weeks ago
lilroff9000
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 11
graphgraph
User Offline
 
The question is who knew these accusations were false. Within the Administration a bunch knew the data was 'cooked' and they passed it off as fact. Was Bush used or did he know enough not to ask? Sadly we will never know but the money is on the fact that Bush was told what to say and not to ask any questions and even G. W. Bush had enough sense to figure it out. Congress was knowingly given false information yet no one has been indicted or even aggressively investigated. Why, because the folks in the background have pictures. Always remember 'plausible deniability', worked for Reagan and sunk others.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 6 Months, 3 Weeks ago
ejtaal
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 16
graphgraph
User Offline
 
So the Clinton administration and Democratic politicians didn't know that the data was 'cooked' and the Bush administration did. Yeah, right!

I'm willing to admit that our intelligence services need a lot of improvement. But this 'Bush lied' business is just another go round of the Big Lie propaganda machine.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 6 Months, 3 Weeks ago
pra1968
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 14
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Point? You have a point? Beyond the fact that you are a top posting moron? What other point could you have. The FACT is that George Bush and Company went to the wolrd and swore that Iraq was a threat to the US and the world at a time when they had nearly no miliatary capability. These lies have harmed the US in many ways. Why don't you care? PS: top posting is rude and stupid.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 6 Months, 3 Weeks ago
Angelo Michel
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 9
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Clinton is no fool and 9 times out of 10 he saw the 'grand plan' of the PNAC and did not bite. Bush is just a showdog following the instructions of his handlers and patrons both of which are reaping billions off the blood-stained, no-bid contracts. Look up war profiteers and you will find 'bushs' along with the harrimans, rockefellers, walkers and the list goes on and on.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
Copyright © 2006 - Jan 2009 My Democrats Friends